Turtles

Path 5
Page updated: 17 Nov 2025

 

🐢 WCPFC Sea Turtle Bycatch Mitigation Terms

This guide explains key practices and tools used by the WCPFC to reduce sea turtle bycatch and mortality. These terms appear in conservation measures and safe handling guidelines for turtles.

📘 Definitions and Measures

  • Large Circle Hooks: Special hooks with the point turned inward (≤10° offset) that significantly lower sea turtle catch rates in shallow longline sets. They tend to hook turtles in the mouth (if at all), reducing internal injuries

  • Finfish Bait: Using whole fish bait instead of squid. Scientific studies show substantially fewer turtle interactions with fish bait, especially in swordfish-targeting longlines, without reducing target catch.

  • Shallow-Set Longline: A longline fishing method with hooks mainly shallower than 100 m (often targeting swordfish). Turtles are more likely to encounter shallow hooks, so this fishery has specific mitigation rules (e.g. circle hooks, fish bait).

  • Non-entangling FAD: A Fish Aggregating Device designed to prevent entanglement of wildlife. Non-entangling FADs use materials like solid ropes or canvas instead of open netting, to protect turtles and sharks from getting snared.

  • Safe Release Gear: Equipment carried on vessels to handle bycaught turtles. This includes long-handled line cutters and de-hookers to cut lines or remove hooks, and dip nets to lift turtles aboard without injury

Turtles in the WCPO

This page summarizes the status of sea turtles in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (WCPO) and the bycatch mitigation actions adopted by the WCPFC. Five species of marine turtles (leatherback, loggerhead, olive ridley, green, and hawksbill) occur in the WCPFC area, all of which are classified as threatened or endangered. Incidental capture in tuna fisheries (longline and purse seine) is a significant threat to these slow-reproducing animals. WCPFC’s conservation measures focus on reducing fishery interactions and improving post-release survival of turtles caught as bycatch.


WCPFC addresses turtle bycatch through gear regulations, handling protocols, and reporting requirements. All vessels must carry tools for the prompt release of entangled or hooked turtles, and crews are trained to follow FAO guidelines for safe handling. In shallow-set longline fisheries targeting swordfish, fishermen are required to use large circle hooks or whole finfish bait (or other approved measures) to significantly reduce turtle hooking. Purse seine vessels must avoid encircling turtles and take measures to safely release any turtles entangled in nets or FADs. Through these measures – alongside coastal conservation efforts by members – the WCPFC aims to minimize mortality of sea turtles and contribute to the recovery of their populations.

Leatherback Turtle

Latest assessment

2017 population survey (West Pacific) & 2020 status review

Status

Critically Endangered (Pacific populations), with ongoing decline

Key findings

Pacific leatherbacks have declined by ~83% over three decades, with only an estimated ~1,400 mature adults remaining in the West Pacific population as of 2017. Annual nesting counts continue to fall ~5–6% per year. Fishery bycatch is identified as the primary marine threat to this species – leatherbacks migrate across the Pacific and frequently encounter longline hooks. Even low interaction rates can lead to unsustainable mortality given the small population size.

Management

WCPFC’s sea turtle measure (CMM 2018-04) mandates the safe release of all leatherbacks caught, with fishermen required to carry line cutters and de-hookers to free turtles quickly. In practice, crews should keep the turtle in the water if possible, cut the line close to the hook, and avoid any actions that could worsen injuries. For shallow-set longlines, the use of circle hooks and fish bait is compulsory to prevent leatherback interactions. Currently, deep-set tuna fisheries have no mandatory hook/bait rules for turtles, but scientific advice indicates that extending such measures to deep-set longlines would greatly benefit leatherback conservation. Observer programs and electronic monitoring are being strengthened to better document leatherback encounters and survival after release.

Notes

Because leatherbacks are so endangered, every interaction is critical. Requiring 100% careful release is essential – e.g. stop gear retrieval if a leatherback is hooked deeply, and take time to resuscitate exhausted turtles before release (by keeping them onboard in shade with water on their skin). Some WCPFC members have introduced national protections (time-area closures, high observer coverage requirements) in areas of high leatherback interaction to further reduce mortality.

Range and fishery interactions

  • Leatherbacks roam across the Pacific, from tropical nesting beaches (Indonesia, PNG, Solomon Islands) to temperate feeding grounds (e.g. California Current). This extensive range means they can encounter fishing gear in many jurisdictions.
  • Main interactions are with deep-set longlines targeting tuna. Although encounter rates are low (on the order of a few per thousand hooks, the vast fishing effort means total bycatch is significant. A recent estimate was ~250 interactions per year in WCPO longlines, causing on the order of 90 mortalities annually.
  • Leatherbacks can also become entangled in purse seine gear or FADs. Such events are less common but do occur, particularly in equatorial areas. Purse seine crews are required to halt net hauling if a turtle is sighted and disentangle it safely.

Effective bycatch mitigation for fleets

  • Use only circle hooks and fish bait in any shallow (<100 m) sets. Studies have shown large circle hooks dramatically reduce sea turtle hookings without reducing target catch, and switching from squid to fish bait further lowers turtle risk.
  • Carry turtle release tools at all times. Longline vessels should have long-handled cutters and de-hookers ready. Crew should be trained to handle large turtles: if the turtle is too heavy to bring aboard, cut the line as close to the hook as possible while the turtle is alongside, rather than attempting to winch it up.
  • Do not gaff or lift leatherbacks by the flippers or head. Instead, if bringing a turtle on deck (for smaller individuals), use a wide sling or dip net under the body. Once on deck, keep the turtle moist and quickly remove the hook (or tip of the hook) with minimum injury.
  • Avoid key areas when possible. If fishers are aware of regions or seasons with high leatherback presence (e.g. near certain nesting or foraging areas), they can minimize effort there. Some fleets voluntarily move away if multiple turtle interactions occur in a short period.

Monitoring priorities

  • Increase observer coverage in longline fleets to improve bycatch estimates. Leatherback interactions are rare events, so higher coverage (or use of electronic monitoring) is needed to reliably detect and measure bycatch rates.
  • Satellite tagging and post-release studies to understand survival. Attaching satellite tags to incidentally caught leatherbacks upon release can reveal whether they survive and resume normal behavior, informing how effective “safe release” practices are.
  • Collect tissue samples or use photo identification for population tracing. Determining which nesting populations bycaught turtles come from (via genetic samples or tag returns) helps managers identify which rookeries are most impacted by fisheries.

Source documents: 2019–2024 WCPFC Scientific Committee papers on sea turtle bycatchand CMM 2018-04 requirements.

Loggerhead Turtle

Latest assessment

Recent nesting beach trend reports (Japan, 2020)

Status

Endangered (North Pacific population). Some signs of stabilization, but population remains depleted.

Key findings

North Pacific loggerheads nest mainly in Japan and migrate across the Pacific (juveniles cross to feeding areas off North America). The population experienced severe declines in the late 20th century, but nesting counts in Japan have shown partial recovery in the last decade under intensive conservation. Fisheries bycatch was a major historical cause of mortality – especially by shallow-set longliners targeting swordfish. However, the introduction of circle hooks and other measures has greatly reduced loggerhead bycatch rates. Today, continued use of large circle hooks and finfish bait in shallow sets is critical to keep mortality low. Loggerheads are long-lived and slow to mature, so even with recent improvements, it will take decades for the population to rebuild.

Management

WCPFC measures directly address loggerhead bycatch in shallow-set longline fisheries. Since 2010, vessels fishing for swordfish must employ at least one of the following: large circle hooks (minimum standard defined by WCPFC), only use whole finfish for bait, or an equivalent approved mitigation method. In practice, many fleets implement both circle hooks and fish bait for maximum effectiveness. These requirements stem from research showing ~90% reductions in shallow-set turtle catch rates with hook/bait changes. Vessels also must carry dip nets to gently handle turtles and follow handling guidelines (no lifting by the line, no injurious hooks extraction). Every interaction (including releases and condition of the turtle) is recorded and reported by observers or crew logs, contributing to regional bycatch data.

Range and interactions

  • North Pacific loggerheads hatch on beaches in Japan and travel thousands of kilometers to the North Pacific Ocean off North America (e.g. Baja California) to feed. In these pelagic juvenile stages, they often occupy subtropical convergence zones where prey is abundant – unfortunately, these are also areas used by longline fisheries.
  • The highest interaction risk is in subtropical shallow-set longline fisheries targeting swordfish (historically Japan, USA, Taiwan and others). Loggerheads tend to bite baited hooks near the surface. Before mitigation, fleets like Hawaii’s shallow-set fishery had significant loggerhead bycatch; now with 100% observer coverage and required circle hooks/finfish bait, average interactions have dropped sharply.
  • Purse seine interactions with loggerheads are relatively rare (loggerheads are less prone to FAD entanglement than olive ridleys, for example). Nonetheless, any loggerhead encountered in a net must be released unharmed. Coastal gillnet and trawl fisheries (outside WCPFC mandate) are also a concern for this species’ survival, though those are managed by domestic regulations.

Effective actions for fleets

  • Use the largest circle hooks feasible (e.g. 18/0 or 20/0) with ≤10° offset. These dramatically reduce deep hooking in turtles. In addition, use only fish for bait – e.g. mackerel – instead of squid. This combination has been proven in multiple oceans to cut turtle bycatch while maintaining catch of swordfish and tuna.
  • Implement smart fishing practices: if many turtles are encountered in an area or season, consider moving operations to a different area or delaying fishing, rather than continuing to interact with turtles. WCPFC members are encouraged to avoid known turtle hotspots during peak seasons.
  • Handle hooked turtles gently: when a loggerhead is on the line, stop the gear haul and bring the turtle alongside the vessel. Use a dip net or lift it by its shell (supporting its weight) if size allows. Remove the hook with a de-hooker if it’s in the mouth, or cut the line as close as possible if the hook is swallowed. Release the turtle head-first back into the water once it’s vigorous.

Monitoring and research

  • Continue to monitor nesting beach trends in Japan and elsewhere. Nest counts are a primary indicator of loggerhead population health and will reflect the long-term success of bycatch mitigation.
  • Observer coverage and electronic monitoring in longline fleets should remain high, especially in known loggerhead areas (e.g. 100% coverage in the Hawaii shallow-set fishery provides invaluable data on interaction rates and turtle condition on release).
  • Investigate post-release fate: even after safe release, some turtles may experience injury or stress. Tagging released loggerheads with satellite or archival tags can inform post-release survival rates and any delayed mortality, helping to refine handling protocols.

Source documents: WCPFC Sea Turtle CMM 2018-04; FAO circle hook studies and Common Oceans workshop findings; ISC and national reports on loggerhead trends.

Olive Ridley Turtle

Latest assessment

No formal Pacific-wide assessment; IUCN Red List (globally Vulnerable)

Status

Vulnerable globally. Some large nesting populations exist, but Pacific sub-populations are uncertain.

Key findings

Olive ridleys are the smallest Pacific sea turtle and are known for mass nesting events (arribadas) on certain beaches. In the open ocean, they tend to associate with floating objects and debris. This behavior leads to frequent entanglement in drifting FADs and occasional capture in purse seine nets. They are also caught incidentally by longliners in tropical areas, though to a lesser extent than leatherbacks or loggerheads. Observer data indicate olive ridley interactions in WCPO fisheries occur but are likely under-reported (due to low observer coverage in some fleets). Dead olive ridleys are sometimes found entangled in FAD materials or marine debris, highlighting the entanglement risk. Because olive ridley population trends in the WCPO are not well quantified, there is uncertainty about the impact of fishery bycatch, but any excessive mortality could be locally significant.

Management

The WCPFC sea turtle measure applies generically to olive ridleys: any caught must be released alive and unharmed where possible. Purse seine vessels are specifically required to avoid encircling turtles. If an olive ridley is spotted in the net, the crew must stop net roll as soon as it’s out of the water and disentangle it before resuming. Turtles found entangled in FADs must also be freed. WCPFC is encouraging the use of non-entangling FAD designs to prevent turtles from getting caught in hanging nets or ropes. Longline vessels encountering olive ridleys must follow the same release protocols as for other turtles (using line cutters and de-hookers to promptly free the turtle). There is no species-specific catch limit or gear requirement for olive ridleys, but the general shift toward circle hooks and safer fishing practices benefits them as well.

Interactions and risk

  • Olive ridleys inhabit tropical and subtropical waters. They are more commonly found in the equatorial Pacific, often far from land except during nesting season. This oceanic lifestyle means they encounter fishery gear primarily in purse seine FAD sets and occasionally shallow longlines.
  • Purse seine FAD sets historically had the highest olive ridley mortality due to entanglement in old-style FADs (which often had open net webbing underneath). Many such entanglements go unseen unless an observer or camera is present. The move to fully non-entangling FADs (using sheets or cords that minimize loops) is expected to greatly reduce this source of mortality.
  • Longline bycatch of olive ridleys does occur, with turtles usually hooked in shallow sets. Olive ridleys can dive, but they often feed near the surface on jellyfish and floating prey, which is why baited hooks near the surface pose a risk.

Effective actions

  • Use non-entangling FAD designs and regularly remove any entangling debris. This includes avoiding any loose netting on FADs – WCPFC regulations now prohibit mesh net tails on FADs precisely to protect turtles and sharks.
  • Train purse seine crews on turtle release: when brailing the catch, be vigilant for any turtles and release them before they go into the power block or brail. If an olive ridley is brought on deck, lift it with a net or by the shell, not by the flippers, and release it promptly.
  • For longliners, apply the same mitigation as for other turtles: circle hooks, fish bait, and diligent watching of lines. If an olive ridley is hooked, bring it alongside and cut the line near the hook or remove the hook if easily accessible. Because olive ridleys are smaller, crew sometimes can bring them aboard to remove hooks more gently.

Data and monitoring needs

  • Better data on olive ridley bycatch in coastal artisanal fisheries of the Pacific Islands and Southeast Asia, which are not well reported but may impact local populations.
  • Dedicated studies on olive ridley movements in the WCPO. Tagging studies could reveal if there are specific high-use areas (for foraging or migration) that overlap with tuna fisheries, which could inform spatial mitigation (e.g. seasonal advisories or closures).
  • Monitoring of FAD entanglement rates through both observer programs and emerging technologies (e.g. fishery-driven FAD monitoring or acoustic sensors) to ensure entanglement prevention measures are working.

Source documents: WCPFC Sea Turtle CMM (purse seine rules) and FAD design recommendations; FAO sea turtle bycatch reports; regional stranding data on FAD entanglements.

Green Turtle

Latest assessment

Nesting beach assessments (various Pacific sites, 2018–2022)

Status

Endangered (most Pacific sub-populations). Some populations increasing, others still declining.

Key findings

Green turtles primarily inhabit coastal waters (bays, reefs and seagrass beds), but juveniles and sub-adults can disperse far into the open ocean. Major nesting populations in the WCPO (e.g. in Micronesia, Polynesia, Northern Australia) have shown mixed trends – some recovering due to nesting beach protection, others under threat from egg harvest or climate change. Because of their more coastal ecology, green turtles are less frequently caught in high-seas tuna fisheries than other turtle species. Nevertheless, interactions do occur occasionally: juvenile greens have been recorded by observers in pelagic longlines and purse seines, albeit at very low incidence. Any bycatch mortality adds to other pressures on greens (coastal fisheries, habitat loss). Notably, the WCPFC recognizes all marine turtles as threatened, so greens are included in its bycatch mitigation efforts despite their rarer interactions offshore.

Management

No turtle species is excluded from WCPFC’s sea turtle measure – the safe release requirements and gear rules apply equally to green turtles. If a green turtle is caught in a longline, the crew must release it following the established protocol (cut the line or gently remove hook, do not injure the flippers or head, etc.). Purse seiners must similarly release any green turtles entangled in nets or FADs. There are no specific gear modifications aimed only at green turtles, since their bycatch is already minimized by measures for leatherback/loggerhead (circle hooks, etc.). However, some additional protections for greens come via domestic laws (for example, coastal gillnet bans in some nations, or protection of important foraging grounds). WCPFC’s role is mainly to ensure any green turtle encountered in its fisheries is handled in a way that maximizes survival.

Fishery profile

  • Greens are herbivorous and spend much of their life in shallow coastal areas. Hatchlings and small juveniles, however, are pelagic drifters for several years (the "lost years"), during which they can end up in the open ocean and potentially interact with tuna fisheries. These young turtles often travel with currents and may associate with flotsam lines or convergence zones where food (like barnacles or small invertebrates) accumulates.
  • Recorded green turtle bycatch in WCPO fisheries is very low. When it happens, it’s often a juvenile or sub-adult hooked in a longline closer to coastal regions or on a drifting FAD in a purse seine. Given their rarity in these fisheries, each interaction tends to be reported individually in national reports.
  • The greater threat to green turtles in the Pacific comes from outside the WCPFC pelagic fisheries: coastal netting, directed take, boat strikes, and climate impacts on nesting beaches. Nonetheless, the Commission’s bycatch measures serve as an added safety net when greens do appear in pelagic gear.

Effective actions

  • Ensure all fishing captains and crew can identify green turtles (versus other species) and are aware they must be released unharmed. Misidentification is not a major issue (greens have a distinct appearance), but proper species ID helps in tracking population impacts.
  • Follow the standard handling guidelines meticulously: for example, if a green turtle is comatose or inactive when brought alongside, bring it aboard carefully and attempt to resuscitate it (e.g. keep it upright and moist, let it recover strength). Do not simply discard an unconscious turtle – revival techniques have saved many turtles.
  • Report every interaction through the required channels. Because greens are infrequent bycatch in WCPO fisheries, a comprehensive record (even of single turtle incidents) is important to detect any change in frequency over time. This reporting also helps identify if certain areas see repeated interactions that might warrant attention.

Research needs

  • Genetic sampling of bycaught green turtles to link them to nesting populations. This can clarify which rookeries (e.g. Great Barrier Reef, Micronesia, etc.) might be contributing juveniles to pelagic zones and facing risks.
  • Climate change impact studies on green turtle sex ratios and distribution – as warming could alter hatchling survival and could push more juveniles into pelagic habitats, potentially changing future interaction patterns with fisheries.

Source documents: WCPFC Sea Turtle CMM (general provisions; SPC bycatch reports; IUCN Red List assessments for green turtles.

Hawksbill Turtle

Latest assessment

Global status review (IUCN 2020); no WCPO-specific assessment

Status

Critically Endangered globally. Extremely low numbers in most Pacific regions.

Key findings

Hawksbill turtles are primarily reef-associated and are the least encountered by WCPO tuna fisheries. They suffered historical declines due to the tortoiseshell trade and remain very scarce in the Pacific (except a few localized nesting strongholds). Because hawksbills do not typically inhabit the open ocean for long, their interactions with pelagic gear are extremely rare. Observer records in the WCPO show very few (if any) hawksbill captures in longline or purse seine fisheries in recent decades. However, given their critical status, even isolated cases of bycatch are concerning. Hawksbills’ conservation is mostly driven by coastal management (MPAs, nest protection, trade bans), but WCPFC’s bycatch measures provide an added precaution in case they are encountered at sea.

Management

All WCPFC-mandated bycatch measures for turtles apply to hawksbills, even if interactions are practically nil. This means that if a hawksbill is accidentally hooked or entangled, vessels must release it following the established safe-handling procedures (gentle handling, use of cutters, etc.. There are no specific gear requirements aimed at hawksbills (since they are not a factor in typical tuna fishing operations), but the general use of circle hooks and non-entangling FADs is beneficial. Hawksbills are often found around fish aggregating devices near coasts; ensuring FADs deployed in their habitat are non-entangling and eventually biodegradable can prevent ghost-fishing injuries. In summary, WCPFC’s influence on hawksbill recovery is indirect and precautionary, reinforcing that any bycatch of this species must be minimized and reported.

Profile

  • Hawksbills feed on coral reef sponges and are typically found in shallow coastal waters. Juveniles may drift in the pelagic environment for a short phase after hatching, but they soon recruit to reef habitats. Thus, the likelihood of encountering a hawksbill in the open ocean tuna fisheries is extremely low compared to other turtles.
  • On the rare occasion a hawksbill is encountered by a WCPO fishery (for example, a small juvenile under a FAD), it is a critically important individual for the species. Survival of every hawksbill matters for population recovery, so handling must be impeccable. The same WCPFC guidelines for safe release apply: don’t injure the carapace or flippers, and if the turtle appears weak, allow time for recovery before release.

Effective actions

  • Support broader conservation initiatives. Though beyond WCPFC’s direct mandate, members can aid hawksbill recovery by supporting habitat protection and national laws that eliminate hawksbill harvesting and trade. Healthy coastal populations reduce the chance that the only encounter with a hawksbill is in a fishing context.
  • Maintain non-entangling FAD practices, as hawksbills, especially juveniles, could get entangled in nearshore FADs or debris. Quick reporting and removal of any derelict fishing gear in coastal areas can prevent hawksbill injuries.
  • Educate crews that hawksbills (with their beautiful shell) are legally protected – any intentional harm or retention is strictly prohibited. While this may seem obvious, it is important for crew from all cultural backgrounds to understand the importance of releasing even a rare, valuable-looking turtle.

Monitoring

  • Record any hawksbill interactions in detail. If a hawksbill is caught, data such as size, photo identification, and genetic sample (if possible) should be collected, as encounters are so infrequent that each provides valuable scientific information.
  • Coordinate data with other ocean regions. Hawksbills in the WCPO could potentially originate from populations in the Coral Triangle or elsewhere. Sharing any bycatch records with Indian Ocean and Southeast Asian conservation bodies helps build a complete picture of hawksbill movements and threats.

Source documents: WCPFC Sea Turtle CMM (safe release obligations); IUCN Hawksbill assessment; SPREP reports on marine turtle status.

How WCPFC manages turtle bycatch

  • Mandatory safe handling and release: All WCPFC members must ensure fishers follow standardized guidelines to handle and release any caught sea turtle with minimal injury. This includes bringing comatose turtles onboard for revival if feasible, using proper tools to remove hooks, and releasing turtles only after they have recovered sufficiently.
  • Gear requirements in longline fisheries: Longline vessels are required to carry turtle release equipment (long-handled de-hookers, line cutters, dip nets) and use them when a turtle is caught. In addition, shallow-set swordfish longline fleets must use large circle hooks and/or fish bait to significantly reduce the likelihood of turtle bycatch. These measures have been shown to lower turtle catch rates dramatically while maintaining target catches.
  • Operational measures in purse seine fisheries: Purse seine vessels are instructed to avoid encircling turtles during sets. If a turtle is spotted in the net, the crew must stop hauling (net roll) and carefully disentangle the turtle before continuing. Turtles entangled in FADs or debris must be released. Vessels also carry dip nets to facilitate safe handling of turtles in the water.
  • Non-entangling FADs: The WCPFC encourages and increasingly requires the use of FAD designs that prevent sea turtle entanglement. This means FADs with no loose netting or ropes in which turtles (and other animals) can get snagged. Members share research on improved FAD designs and are urged to adopt best practices to eliminate FAD-related turtle mortality.
  • Reporting and monitoring: Countries must report all sea turtle interactions in their annual reports to WCPFC. The Regional Observer Programme also collects data on turtle bycatch, providing the Scientific Committee with information to assess trends. The Commission reviews this information regularly to update measures as needed. Efforts are underway to enhance observer coverage (including electronic monitoring) to better capture rare turtle bycatch events.
  • Cooperative initiatives: The WCPFC collaborates with other organizations (e.g., the IATTC in the Eastern Pacific) to ensure consistent turtle bycatch mitigation across ocean basins. It also utilizes FAO guidelines and supports capacity-building (through its Special Requirements Fund) to help developing states train fishers in turtle-safe practices.

Key measure: CMM 2018-04 (Conservation and Management Measure for Sea Turtles, rev. 2018) guides these actions, updating the original 2008 measure in line with current best practices.

Data needs and next steps
  • Higher observer coverage and e-monitoring: Improving the coverage of observer programs on longline vessels is a top priority. Many turtle interactions go unobserved under the current 5% or lower coverage in most fleets. Electronic monitoring systems (cameras on boats) can complement human observers to ensure that rare events like turtle bycatch are recorded, even on vessels without an observer onboard.
  • Mitigation for deep-set fisheries: Continue research into bycatch mitigation in deep-set tuna longline fisheries. Currently, measures like circle hooks are urged (but not mandatory) in deep sets. Studies on turtle interaction rates in deep vs shallow sets, and trials of circle hooks in deep sets, could support expanding mandatory measures to all longlines. The Commission has scheduled a review to consider additional measures for deep-set fisheries, given evidence of leatherback and olive ridley bycatch in those operations.
  • Post-release mortality studies: Invest in programs that track sea turtle outcomes after release. This could include satellite tagging turtles that have been bycaught to see how many survive long-term. Knowing the true survival rate of released turtles (perhaps through projects coordinated with NOAA and other partners) will help refine handling guidelines and quantify the benefit of current measures.
  • Better species-specific data: Encourage reporting that distinguishes turtle species and details size/condition. Hawksbill vs green vs olive ridley can sometimes be confused if observers are not trained well. Accurate species identification in logs, along with carapace length measurements and notes on injuries, will improve risk assessments for each species. Capacity-building in identification (e.g. waterproof ID guides, training workshops) is an ongoing need.
  • Integration with coastal conservation: Strengthen dialogue between WCPFC fisheries management and coastal turtle conservation programs. For example, data on fisheries bycatch can be shared with turtle nesting beach managers to get a full picture of threats. Conversely, trends at nesting beaches (e.g. leatherback nesting declines) should inform the urgency of fishery measures. A holistic approach, potentially via the WCPFC’s Ecosystem and Bycatch Working Group, will ensure bycatch mitigation stays responsive to turtle population status.